Legal Opinion

Idlewild Farm Co. v. Elkhorn River Drainage District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1925No. 23421PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDean, J.

Plaintiff sued in Dodge county to recover damages for injury to its farm lands which, it is alleged, arose from defendant’s negligence in the installation of drainage construction and diversion works on the banks of the Elkhorn river on and adjacent to a part of that portion of plaintiff’s lands through which the river then flowed. In its natural course the Elkhorn river is a whirling, winding stream and has many abrupt bends; and the works here in question were Installed with the view, in part at least, of materially shortening the river by causing it to flow through a newly formed and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Churchill v. BaumannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People ex rel. Roediger v. Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Ritchie v. City of South TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. Wheat v. Van TineMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Armbruster v. Stanton-Pilger Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. ENTERPRISE COMPANY v. Sanitary District No. OneNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Idlewild Farm Co. v. Elkhorn River Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Dowd v. DowdIdaho Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API