Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Williams

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 25, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Writ of entry, to recover a parcel of land in Charlton. Plea, nul disseisin. The case was submitted to the Superior Court, and, after judgment for the demandants, to this court on appeal, on agreed facts, which appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtW. Allen, J.

The demandants are the heirs of Orison Johnson, who died intestate on July 6, 1888. On the day before his death, July 5, 1888, Marsha Johnson, his wife, died, leaving no issue living, and leaving a will dated August 23, 1883, to which her husband gave no written consent, by which she devised all her real estate to her husband for his life, with remainder to the tenant in fee. After the probate of the will, on September 4, 1888, the tenant took possession of such real estate, which consisted of the demanded premises, and was of less value than five thousand dollars. The only question is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sears v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Burroughs v. NuttingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  3. Burke v. ColbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McKim v. HaleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Motherway v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  3. Bunnell v. HixonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Manning v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Wilson v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API