Legal Opinion

632 Metacom, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. XSZ146282

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 4, 2021No. 1:20-cv-03905Unknown

1Opinion

DELOECCUTMREONNTI CALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 632 METACOM, INC. d/b/a HOMETOWN TAVERN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, No. 20-CV-3905 (RA) v. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. XSZ146282, Defendants. RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff 632 Metacom, Inc. d/b/a Hometown Tavern brought this putative class action against Defendants Certain Underwriters at Lloyds’s, London Subscribing to Policy No. XSZ146282 alleging…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. D.H. Blair & Co. v. GottdienerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. New York Marine & General Insurance v. Lafarge North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  4. Roby v. Corp. of Lloyd'sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Dorothy Ruth Pirone, Julia Ruth Stevens, Babe Ruth League, Incorporated and Curtis Management Group, Incorporated v. MacMillan IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API