Roberts v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STRINGER, Judge.
Theodore Roberts challenges his convictions for aggravated stalking, battery, harassing telephone calls, criminal mischief, burglary of a dwelling with assault or battery, aggravated battery, and assault. Roberts raises three points on appeal, two of which have merit. We reject Roberts’ argument that the trial court failed to conduct a proper Faretta1 hearing without further discussion. However, because the trial court abused its discretion in cutting short Roberts’ voir dire without notice and erred as a matter of law in refusing to permit Roberts to use his peremptory…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Trotter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- McKenna v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dragon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- FELIPE HERNANDEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019