Legal Opinion
Cantwell Machinery Co. v. Chicago Machinery Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 3, 2009No. 08AP-1040PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Klatt, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Chicago Machinery Company (“Chicago”), appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court granting judgment to plaintiff-appellee, Cantwell Machinery Company (“Cantwell”). For the following reasons, we affirm that judgment.
{¶ 2} In 1999, Chicago leased a 1988 Volvo A25 water truck to third-party defendant, RBD Construction (“RBD”). Pursuant to the lease terms, RBD was liable for any damage it caused to the truck except for normal wear and tear.
{¶ 3} In the summer of 2000, the truck would not start. Ron Depascale, RBD’s owner, called Joe…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Royal Electric Construction Corp. v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cranpark, Inc. v. Rogers Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Lycan v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Wildcat Drilling, L.L.C. v. Discovery Oil & Gas, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Crutcher v. Oncology/Hematology Care, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Feathers v. Ohio Dept. Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.