Legal Opinion

Mark Allen Cates v. Superintendent, Indiana Youth Center

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 11, 1992No. 90-3009PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Chief Judge.

In this habeas corpus appeal, we determine whether counsel’s joint representation of two defendants during the initial phases of their criminal proceedings violated Petitioner Mark Cates’ Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel. We find no constitutional violation, and reverse the district court’s grant of Cates’ petition.

I. Factual Background

A. State Court Proceedings

In October 1984, Mark Cates and Dennis Hanaway were charged with one count each of felony forgery and felony theft, two counts of burglary, attempted escape, and criminal mischief. In two…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Kevin T. Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Freeman HolmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Sidney SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Lee Otis Griffin v. Althea Camp, Warden, Graham Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API