Legal Opinion

Hobart Corp. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 22, 1984No. C-3-80-326PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY CONDITIONALLY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ITEMS # 1, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 17 AND 18, AND THEREBY CONDITIONALLY OVERRULING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THESE ITEMS; PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ITEMS # 4, 6, 13 AND 20 IS SUSTAINED, AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THESE ITEMS IS OVERRULED; PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS OVERRULED ON ITEMS #5, 15 AND 16, AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THESE ITEMS IS SUSTAINED; PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ITEMS #19 AND 21 IS…

2Cases cited85 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baudin v. City of Crystal LakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. Gould Inc. v. General Services AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
  3. Hobart Corp. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
  4. Baudin v. City of Crystal LakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API