Legal Opinion

Tennessee Valley Bank v. Sewell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 1, 1926No. 8 Div. 806PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

When a mortgagor conveys the mortgaged property, and his grantee assumes the payment of the mortgage as between the mortgagor and his grantee, the grantee becomes the principal debtor primarily liable for the debt, and the mortgagor becomes a surety with all the consequences flowing from the relationship. As between these two and the mortgagee, although he may treat them both as debtors, and may enforce the liability against either, still, after notice of the assumption, he is bound to recognize the condition of surety-ship and to respect the rights of the surety in all of his subsequent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hamilton v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Upchurch v. WestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. BrawnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Ackley v. NoggleSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  4. Tarrant Land Co. v. Palmetto Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Maulitz v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API