Embleton v. Senatus
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtDamoorgian, J.
This is an appeal from a final judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the appellants, Grace and Gary Embleton (the Embletons). On appeal, the Embletons claim that the trial court erred in denying their challenge of a prospective juror for cause. We affirm after concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the cause challenge.
By way of background, the Embletons sued Frank Senatus for injuries sustained in an automobile collision. During jury selection, counsel for both parties questioned the prospective jurors in an effort to reveal any biases or prejudices.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Trotter v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Rolling v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Gore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Weinstein Design Group, Inc. v. FielderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- JUDITH PEARSON, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE v. IN RE: ENGLE PROGENY CASES TOBACCO LITIGATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Pearson v. Philip Morris USA Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Pearson v. Philip Morris USA Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019