Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Friends of the Hastain Trail v. Coldwater Development LLC

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 2016No. B249841, B251814Published

1Concurrence

CHANEY, J.,

Concurring.—I concur with the opinion in order to express an individual view on two issues.

First, even if substantial use of a fire road could ripen into public dedication of the servient tenement, no substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that the “Hastain Fire Road” experienced such use.

*1039‘“[W]here an intent to dedicate is implied as a legal fiction from the nature of public usage, the caselaw requires a high standard of usage, lest private property rights be too easily diminished.” (Hanshaw v. Long Valley Road Assn. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 471, 482 [11 Cal.Rptr.3d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gion v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Seaway Co. v. Attorney General of the StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Friends of the Trails v. BlasiusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Hanshaw v. Long Valley Road Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API