Legal Opinion

Carr v. Carr

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for an order allowing the plaintiff to reargue an application to punish the defendant for contempt of court. .

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

It is true that the inception of contempt proceedings in matrimonial actions is regulated exclusively by the provisions of section 1773, of the Code, which specify the circumstances under which an application to punish may be made and the form and substance of the order which may be granted upon such an application. Stewart v. Stewart, 127 App. Div. 724; People ex rel. Ready v. Walsh, 132 id. 462. The same section provides, however, that when the order has been made the subsequent proceedings must be taken as prescribed in article 19 of the Judiciary Law, which now embraces what was formerly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grant v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. Goldie v. GoldieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Stewart v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Weich v. WeichNew York Supreme Court · 1908
  5. State Bank v. WilchinskyNew York Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosenthal v. RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API