Legal Opinion · Dissent

Collins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 9, 1980No. 80-118Published

1DissentOrfinger, Judge

I respectfully dissent. As I read Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Cr.P., if the trial judge deems a motion legally insufficient on its face, he may summarily deny the motion and need not attach copies of the record or grant an evidentiary hearing. Although the trial judge did not so state here, we must assume that he found the motion insufficient on its face because he did not attach copies or grant an evidentiary hearing, and review the order in that light. It is a useless act to send this case back to the trial judge merely to have him tell us that he'found the motion insufficient on its face. I think it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Parker v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Edward Morgan MacKenna v. O. B. Ellis, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  4. Meeks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  5. United States v. Raymond M. FesselCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API