Legal Opinion

Bridges v. Melton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 19, 1925No. 16492PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Where an affidavit of illegality to the foreclosure of a mortgage on personalty was not accompanied either by a replevy bond or by an affidavit in forma pauperis as prescribed by the Civil Code, § 3301, the affidavit so interposed was a nullity. Brantley v. Baker, 75 Ga. 676 (1); Shannon v. Vincent, 76 Ga. 837; Glass v. Austin, 28 Ga. App. 311 (111 S. E. 84); Dawson v. Planters Bank, 31 Ga. App. 530 (121 S. E. 242).

2. Rule 29 of the superior courts, as contained in the Civil Code (1910), § 6288, providing that no second affidavit of illegality shall be received for causes which existed and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  2. Jordan v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Crowley & Co. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. Brantley v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  5. Glass v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cox v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  2. Fong v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API