Legal Opinion

Seaman v. New York Life Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1941No. 8,182PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson

This is an action brought to recover disability benefits under a policy of insurance written by the defendant company on the life of the plaintiff and which provides for the payment of total and permanent disability benefits, the provision therefor in the policy being as follows:

“Disability shall be considered total whenever the Insured is so disabled by bodily injury or disease that he is wholly prevented from performing any work, from following any occupation, or from engaging in any business for remuneration or profit.

“Upon receipt at the Company’s Home Office * * * of due proof that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Berry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Hodgson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. MatzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Casson v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1982
  2. Nelson v. Combined Insurance Company of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Nelson v. Combined Insurance Company of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API