Legal Opinion
Crosslands Properties, Inc. v. Univest Crossland Trace, Ltd.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 9, 1987No. 86-3273PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEHAN, Judge.
This is a suit by the seller against two partnerships (the buyers) for damages for the buyers’ alleged breaches of two contracts for the sale of real estate by failing to close. The seller appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the buyers. We reverse.
As an affirmative defense the buyers alleged that they were under no obligation to close because the contracts provided that if the buyers failed to notify the seller within a certain time period in writing of the buyers’ approval of certain contingencies, i.e., that certain facts upon which the contracts were made…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Heredia v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Pan American Engineering v. Poncho's Const.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- AC ASSOCIATES v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- FIRST MORTG., INC. v. Boulevard Nat. Bank of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Vitra-Spray of Florida, Inc. v. GumenickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Okeechobee Resorts, L.L.C. v. E Z Cash Pawn, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Wilson v. WoodwardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Fort Walton Beach Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. PearsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999