Legal Opinion

James v. Kuhn

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1932No. Docket No. 4425PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem,.

The action was to recover a balance claimed due ■ to plaintiff from defendant pursuant to the terms of a written contract, of which hereinafter. 'The proceeding became really one of accounting and after trial the court below awarded judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in the sum of $385.42. The defendant appeals.

On the twenty-first day of December, 1928, plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement in writing, terms of which follow. Kuhn, being the owner of 900 head of ewe sheep, ranging in age from two to seven years, leased the band to James to be…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pueblo v. Rubert Hermanos, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1938
  2. Hollis v. BenderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. People v. Rubert Hermanos, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1938
  4. People v. StubblefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API