Legal Opinion
Matek v. Murat
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 25, 1988No. Nos. 86-6292, 86-6302, 86-6303, 86-6371, 86-6372 and 87-5592PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
The major issue in this appeal is whether the appellants’ general partnership interests are securities under the federal securities laws. The lower court held that the interests were not securities, stayed the appellants’ RICO claims pending this appeal, and dismissed pendent state claims. The district court also denied the Murats’ motion for execution on bonds given by the appellants to secure an injunction. Matek v. Murat, 638 F.Supp. 775, 784 (C.D.Cal.1986). We AFFIRM the district court’s summary judgment as to the securities claims, the stay of the RICO claims, and…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Warren B. Sheinkopf v. John K.P. Stone Iii, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Mireles v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Holden v. HagopianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.