Harlan v. First State Bank of Sterling City

(after stating the facts as above). If appellant is entitled to complain of the judgment, it is not on the ground first presented in his brief, to- wit, “that the undisputed evidence showed that the note was payable in Nueces county”; for, plainly, as appears from the statement above, the evidence did not undisputedly show that.

The other contention presented in said brief is that the judgment is wrong because it appeared from the testimony (appellant asserts) that the note sued upon, as written by him, and as he intended it to be, was payable in said Nueces county.

The contention, if…