Jansen v. McNamara
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Count, Tripp County. Hop. William Williamson, Judge. Action by J. I. Jansen, 'and1 Edward Hiaisch, co-partners, as Jansen & Hiaisch, again'st J. M. McNamara; ini which defend'anlt counterclaims. Prom a judgment far plaintiffs upon directed verdict, defendant appeals. (1) To .pdint one of the opinion, Respondent cited: State v. Bulrns 25, S. D. 368; 2, Am. & Eng.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Circuit Count, Tripp County. Hop. William Williamson, Judge. Action by J. I. Jansen, 'and1 Edward Hiaisch, co-partners, as Jansen & Hiaisch, again'st J. M. McNamara; ini which defend'anlt counterclaims. Prom a judgment far plaintiffs upon directed verdict, defendant appeals. (1) To .pdint one of the opinion, Respondent cited: State v. Bulrns 25, S. D. 368; 2, Am. & Eng. Enel, of Practice, 814; North Star Boot i& Shoe Go. v. Stebbins, 3, S'. E>., 540. (2) T,o point two of the opinion, Appellant cited: Equitable L'oan & Security Company v. H. L. Lewman, 3 L. R. A. N. S. 879; Boyd v.…
1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.
On December 18, 1910, the plaintiffs and the defendant were copartners doing a mercantile business at Carter, S. D., under the firm name of Jansen-MeNamara Company. *156On HJhiait date the defendant -sold his one-fourth interest in the firm to. plaintiff Hiaiseh. The contract between them recited:
“All liabilities (of 'the old firm) to be deducted from said invoice and assumed by the new.firm.”
The new firm was Jansen & Haisoh, these plaintiffs. A bill of goods 'that had' been ordered by McNamara for the old firm was -refused -by the new firm. Action was 'brought thereon against Jansen & McNamara.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Equitable Loan & Security Co. v. LewmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- North Star Boot & Shoe Co. v. StebbinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- North Star Boot & Shoe Co. v. StebbinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by1 opinion
- Svoboda v. De WaldNebraska Supreme Court · 1955