Legal Opinion

Throm v. Hollister

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 2, 1923No. 11671PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAY, C.

This action was commenced by O. K. Hollister, as guardian for Rachel Hollister, to set aside a tax deed issued to and held by Joe Throm, to quiet title to, and for the possession of, 80 acres of land in Caddo county. J. C. Bell, as tenant, and C. W. Ludwiek, claiming some interest, were joined with Throm as defendants. Plaintiff recovered judgment as prayed and the defendant Joe Throm appeals.

Plaintiff in error relies for a reversal of the judgment upon a variance in the proof from the allegations contained in the petition. Plaintiff’s title rested upon a sheriff’s deed, a…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ward v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Traders Compress Co. v. PrecureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. McGrath v. DurhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Barnsdall Nat. Bank v. DykesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Conaway v. BoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API