Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hiles v. Americare Home Therapy, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 31, 2015No. 5D15-9Published

1Concurrence

SAWAYA, J.,.concurring.

I concur in the majority opinion because I am bound by this court’s decision in *456Florida Hematology & Oncology v. Tummala, 927 So.2d 135 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006), which holds that referral sources are not a legitimate business interest under section 542.335(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2014). If it were not for Tummala, I would affirm that part of the temporary injunction that concludes the referral sources of Ameri-care Home Therapy, Inc., d/b/a Americare Home Health (“Americare”) áre a legitimate business interest under the statute. I believe that Tummala stretches too far the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Univ. of Florida, Bd. of Trustees v. SanalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Florida Hematology & Oncology v. TummalaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Infinity Home Care, L.L.C. and Sylvie Forjet v. Amedisys Holding, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API