Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nixon v. Life Insurance Company of Virginia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 1956No. 1794Published

1DissentHood, Associate Judge

In the opening statement appellant twice specifically denied that she was a creditor of the estate. Furthermore, she made no claim that the policies had been assigned, pledged or donated to her either formally or otherwise. Her only claim to the proceeds of the policies was stated by her counsel as follows: “On behalf of Mrs. Nixon we claim the proceeds of each of these policies under the provision of the facility of payment clause, which states that payment may be made to any person equitably entitled thereto. * * * we feel that *309Mrs. Nixon is the primary person under this facility of payment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. French v. LanhamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API