Legal Opinion

Sookraj v. Schindler Elevator Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J., and a jury), entered October 12, 1999, apportioning liability 60% as against defendant Schindler Elevator and 40% as against third-party defendant Marriott Corporation, and awarding plaintiffs, upon their stipulation in lieu of a new trial on damages, damages including $750,000 and $1,500,000 for past and future pain and suffering, respectively, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate the award of damages for past and future pain and suffering, and the matter remanded for a new trial on the issues of such damages only, and otherwise…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Dorchester AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Rountree v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Tucker v. ElimelechAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Gonzalez v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Outeiral v. Otis Elevator Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donlon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Calero v. Statewide Stor. Sys., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API