Legal Opinion

Poindexter v. Warden, FCI Yazoo City

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided June 6, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00150Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION DAVID POINDEXTER PETITIONER V. CAUSE NO. 3:18-CV-150-CWR-LRA WARDEN, FCI YAZOO CITY RESPONDENT ORDER In this

28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition, federal prisoner David Poindexter argues that the usual habeas remedies provided in

28 U.S.C. § 2255

are “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.” Santillana v. Upton,

846 F.3d 779, 782

(5th Cir. 2017) (quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, he bears the burden to demonstrate that: (1) the § 2241 petition raises a claim that is based…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Elonis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. United States v. Jerome WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. Tiofila Santillana v. Jody Upton, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API