Legal Opinion
In re Sutton
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 6, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
The bankrupt moves to dismiss the objections and specifications filed herein by Rose Laszka and her husband, Albert Laszka, because they do not set forth facts or grounds sufficient to constitute a bar to the bankrupt’s discharge, and on the further ground that the specifications set forth legal conclusions. The bankrupt further prays that he be declared to have a full discharge from all debts provable against his estate in this bankruptcy proceeding except such debts as are excepted by law from such discharge.
The specifications of objections to bankrupt’s discharge,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Devereaux v. BelseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Marshall Paper Co. v. TrainCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
- In re HavensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- In re ByrneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re LoweDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
- In Re SummerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- First National Bank v. HaymesCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966
- In Re ScandiffioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1945