Legal Opinion

Bradburn v. Peacock

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 1955No. Civ. 16331PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendant following a jury’s verdict. The action was grounded on the claimed negligent injury of the minor, Sandra Brad-burn. The appeal is presented on an agreed statement. From this it appears that defendant had been engaged in doing the grading and lawn work around the Bradburns’ house located in a new housing tract. On the day in question he had parked his truck across the street. Mrs. Bradburn testified that she had gone into her garage to do some washing and that shortly before 5 p. m. her son Danny came running toward the garage calling: 1 ‘Truck,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cross v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  2. Burnam v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  3. People v. SwistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Davenport v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  5. People v. DelaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. McCaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Hildreth v. KeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. State, in Interest of RrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  4. Litzkuhn v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State ex rel. R. R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API