Amsden v. Danielson
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
After the decision reported in 18 R. I. 787, this case again came before the court on plaintiff’s demurrers to defendant’s rejoinders.
1Opinion of the CourtStiness, J.
This case was before as at a previous term on demurrers to plaintiff’s replication. After the opinion given thereon, 18 R. I. 787, overruling the demurrers, the case went back to the Common Pleas “Division and the defendant filed rejoinders, to which the plaintiff has demurred, and the demurrers are certified to this Division.
The pleadings set up these facts : The plaintiff is the domiciliary executor of the will of Lucretia C. Danielson, a resident of this State. He holds the promissory note of the defendant, payable to the testatrix, upon which this suit is brought. The writ issued January…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whipple v. RobbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hammond v. Oregon & California RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Engelken v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Larsen v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019