Legal Opinion

Indianapolis & Cincinnati R. R. v. Ballard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1864PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from the Decatur Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

This was a suit upon a note and mortgage, with prayer for foreclosure, &c.

The defendants answered in three paragraphs, each purporting to go in bar of the whole action, and each alleging a defence by way of set off.

The first paragraph alleged that the plaintiff, by its machinery, killed a cow, the property of the male defendant, of the value, &e., on the railroad where it was not but might have been fenced, &c.

*449The second paragraph alleged that the plaintiff killed another cow of the male defendant, of the value, &c., on her road, where it could not be fenced, by negligently, &c., running over…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. P. H. & F. M. Roots Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Miami County Bank v. State ex rel. Peru Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Howlett v. DiltsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Harris v. RiversIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Collins v. GrosecloseIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API