Indianapolis & Cincinnati R. R. v. Ballard
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Decatur Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
This was a suit upon a note and mortgage, with prayer for foreclosure, &c.
The defendants answered in three paragraphs, each purporting to go in bar of the whole action, and each alleging a defence by way of set off.
The first paragraph alleged that the plaintiff, by its machinery, killed a cow, the property of the male defendant, of the value, &e., on the railroad where it was not but might have been fenced, &c.
*449The second paragraph alleged that the plaintiff killed another cow of the male defendant, of the value, &c., on her road, where it could not be fenced, by negligently, &c., running over…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by15 opinions
- Wainwright v. P. H. & F. M. Roots Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Miami County Bank v. State ex rel. Peru Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
- Howlett v. DiltsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Harris v. RiversIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Collins v. GrosecloseIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.