Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Baker v. Sunny Chevrolet, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 4, 2003No. 02-1381Published

1Concurrence

RALPH B. GUY, JR., Circuit Judge,

concurring.

I concur in the result and write separately to further clarify the reasons for affirming the decision to grant summary judgment to Sunny Chevrolet in this action for statutory damages under the Truth In Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. § 1640(a)(2). Like the district judge, I would assume, arguendo, a violation of the form and timing requirements of 15 U.S.C. § 1638(b), and its implementing regulation, Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. § 226.17, both because resolution of the issue is unnecessary to this appeal and because the Federal Reserve Board has revised…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Walker v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. John A. Begala v. Pnc Bank, Ohio, National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Brown v. Payday Check Advance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Nigh v. Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API