Legal Opinion

State v. Florance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1974Published

1Opinion of the Court

527 P.2d 1202 (1974)

The STATE of Oregon, Petitioner,

v.

Daniel Harold FLORANCE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.[*]

Argued and Submitted May 8, 1974.

Decided October 17, 1974.

W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., Salem.

J. Bradford Shiley, Jr., Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

TONGUE, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of the possession of drugs which had been taken from his billfold after his arrest on another charge. A motion to suppress that evidence, based upon a claim of…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API