Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Merritt

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 7, 1932No. 12,570PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

Anna N. Merritt and Floyd W. Merritt, called herein the defendants, gave their promissory note for $1,800 to Coralee Bailey, called herein the plaintiff, and secured the same by deed of trust to the public trustee, conveying certain real property in Denver. They also were indebted to the plaintiff on account of certain advancements of money made by her, to secure which indebtedness they conveyed said real property to her by warranty deed. On July 26, 1929, the defendants having' made default in the payment of the note and the other indebtedness, the plaintiff took steps to have the public…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sprague v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  2. Stryker v. DunnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Trust Co. v. RodewaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  2. Franks v. Colorado National Bank-ArapahoeColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API