Hockaday v. Red Line, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment after a jury verdict in favor of the appellee in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. A motion for a new trial was seasonably filed in the lower court, and denied. The precise question before us is whether the conduct of the appellee’s counsel, both in cross-examination and in argument, was calculated to prejudice the jjiry against the appellant to the extent that would warrant a new trial.
The appellant, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, filed an action in the lower court against the appellee,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- New York Central Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Brown v. SwinefordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- Union Pac. R. Co. v. FieldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Sanford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gafford v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- Rochester Civic Theatre, Inc. v. Maria RamsayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Pingatore v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Carl P. Wagner v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- United States v. 564.54 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.