Legal Opinion

People v. Dietz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSears, J.

The crime of which the defendant has been convicted consisted of breaking into a New York Central freight car at Canandaigua on December 15, 1924, and taking from the car a barrel of whisky. Reversal is urged by the defendant on the grounds that guilt is not established and that in any event there is no evidence other than that of accomplices tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime, and that the court erred in receiving certain evidence. A careful perusal of the entire case leads to the conclusion that there was sufficient proof to warrant the jury in finding as they…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. People v. . De GarmoNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. People v. . Van TasselNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. People v. Van TasselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. People v. . KasprzykNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pueblo v. González VillapolSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940
  2. People v. FigaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. People v. González VillapolSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API