Legal Opinion
United States v. Morgan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 14, 1953No. Civ. A. 43-757PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOPICAL ARRANGEMENT OF OPINION
Introduction.
The Offense as Charged in the Complaint.
Certain Alleged Unifying Elements Abandoned or Disproved.
The Applicable Law Relative to Conspiracy.
Part I:
The Investment Banking Business.
I. Prior to the First World War.
II. Between World War I and the Securities Act of 1933.
III. Further Developments 1933-1949.
IV. How the Investment Banker Functions.
Part II:
The Seventeen Defendant Investment Banking Firms.
1. Morgan Stanley & Co.
2. Kuhn Loeb & Co.
3. Smith Barney & Co.
4. Lehman Brothers.
5. Glore Forgan & Co.
6. Kidder Peabody & Co.
7. Goldman Sachs & Co.
8. White…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Tose v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Columbia Pictures CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Brown v. Gilligan, Will & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,244 Axelrod & Co. v. Kordich, Victor & NeufeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.