Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 26, 1969No. 69-CR-276PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JUDD, District Judge.

This case presents a novel question concerning the procedure to be followed in connection with a civil commitment under the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act of 1966. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2901-2906, Title I of Pub.L. 89-793.

Defendant was committed to the custody of the Surgeon General of the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 2902, pursuant to an order signed by Judge Weinstein on July 17, 1969. An information had been filed that day charging him with possession of a New York City welfare check known to have been stolen from the United States mail. 18 U.S.C. § 1708.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GrimmeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. People v. PratherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. United States v. ThorntonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
  4. People v. PratherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. People v. PratherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API