Legal Opinion

Sweet v. Breivogel

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 29, 2019No. Docket: Han-18-196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumphrey, J.

[¶1] In this appeal involving a dispute over payment for the construction of a traditional timber frame home, we consider the connection between the Home Construction Contracts Act (HCCA) and the Unfair Trade Practice Act (UTPA), take this opportunity to underscore the significance of the statutory requirement that construction contracts be formalized in writing, and affirm the judgment. See 5 M.R.S. § 213(1), (2) (2017) ; 10 M.R.S. §§ 1487, 1490 (2017).

I. BACKGROUND

[¶2] The following facts are drawn from the court's judgment and are supported by competent evidence in the record. See Gravison…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Paffhausen v. BalanoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  2. Tungate v. MacLean-Stevens Studios, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. Advanced Construction Corp. v. PileckiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  4. VanVoorhees v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Poussard v. Commercial Credit Plan, Incorporated of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fortney & Weygandt, Inc. v. Lewiston DMEP IXSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
  2. Fair Friend Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. CNC Systems, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
  3. Fair Friend Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. CNC Systems, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
  4. Matthew Pollack v. Jessica FournierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
  5. TOMI LLC v. BREAKWATER DESIGN & BUILD INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API