Legal Opinion

United States v. Victor Todd Budell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1999No. 98-30012PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAKASUGI, Senior District Judge:

Victor Todd Budell (“Budell”), who has been institutionalized at the United States Medical Center in Springfield, Missouri, since his plea of not guilty only by reason of insanity, appeals from an order denying his pro se request for a discharge hearing and appointment of counsel. A certificate of appealability was denied by the district court.

We determine that a certificate of ap-pealability was unnecessary because Bu-dell’s letter request was not a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and that Budell was effectively denied his statutory right to counsel and,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. William King v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Joaquin FoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. VelaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Chavez-Rivas v. OlsenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
  5. United States v. AbreganaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API