Legal Opinion

Erie Insurance Exchange v. Larose

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 19, 2016No. 2D15-5750PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VILLANTI, Chief Judge.

Erie Insurance Exchange appeals the trial court’s order that denied its motion to dismiss Albert Christopher Larose’s complaint, which was based on the argument that the Florida courts did not have personal jurisdiction over Erie, an out-of-state insurance company that does no business in Florida. 1 While the trial court properly found that Larose had established a statutory basis for long-arm jurisdiction, the trial court erred in concluding that Erie had the requisite sufficient minimum contacts with Florida to satisfy constitutional due process. Therefore, we reverse…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Ex parte Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (In re: Rebecca Henderson v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company) (Baldwin Circuit Court: CV-24-901036).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API