Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Chastain

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

The appellee brought suit in the Crawford Circuit Court against appellant in June, 1928, to - cover damages for injury to mules. He bought some mules at’ Park Hill, Oklahoma, and also some mules at Spring-dale, Arkansas, and both lots were shipped to Van Burén, Arkansas. The mules shipped from Park Hill, Oklahoma, arrived at Van Burén at 2 a. m., February 25,1928. They had been shipped from Park Hill on February 24. When they readied Van Burén, instead of placing the car on the .switch adjacent to the stock yards, so- they conld toe unloaded, appellant switched said car of mules to a loading…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Texas Railway Co. v. KappCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API