Legal Opinion

McKelvy v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 19, 1936No. 5891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

As we hold that under the policies here concerned the sons of Mrs. McKelvy, the taxpayers, were the owners thereof, and that their mother had no right to change the beneficiary or power to surrender or to borrow on, the security of such policies, it follows that thq first question here involved is: “Are the proceeds of policies of life insurance issued subject to the laws of Pennsylvania prior to the effective date of the Revenue Act of 1918, in which decedent, as the insured, retained neither reversionary interest nor the power to change the beneficiary, nor the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. PENNSYLVANIA CO., ETC. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Golden v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Pupin's EstateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. Golden v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API