Legal Opinion

State v. Cummings

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 2005No. COA04-949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

Under North Carolina law, a trial court must grant a mistrial when conduct takes place inside or outside the courtroom which results in substantial and irreparable prejudice to the defendant. State v. Brown, 315 N.C. 40, 56, 337 S.E.2d 808, 821 (1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1165, 90 L. Ed. 2d 733 (1986), overruled on other grounds, State v. Vandiver, 321 N.C. 570, 364 S.E.2d 373 (1988). In this case, Defendant argues that double jeopardy bars retrying him because during his initial trial, District Court Judge Charles E. Brown, upon discovering he had knowledge of the facts of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. VandiverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. VandiverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Town of Sylva v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of JpCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API