Legal Opinion

New York City Housing Authority v. Tower Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

The record demonstrates that upon receiving an untimely notice of the claim from plaintiff, defendant issued a formal disclaimer that was timely under the circumstances. Defendant’s delay in issuing the disclaimer was justified, as the timeliness of the disclaimer is measured from the time that the insurer first learns of the grounds for disclaimer (see A.J. McNulty & Co. v Lloyds of London, 306 AD2d 211, 212 [2003]). “An insurer is not required to disclaim on timeliness grounds before conducting a prompt, reasonable investigation into other possible grounds for disclaimer; in fact, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. 2540 Associates, Inc. v. Assicurazioni Generali, S.p.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. DiGuglielmo v. Travelers Property CasualtyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. A.J. McNulty & Co. v. Lloyds of LondonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API