Legal Opinion

People v. Roth

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1986No. Docket 85388PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant pled guilty to obtaining a controlled substance by fraud. MCL 333.7407(1)(c); MSA 14.15(7407)(1)(c). He was sentenced to five years probation with the first year to be served in the county jail.

Shortly after his release from jail, the probation department moved to amend defendant’s probation by adding the following conditions:

Add Rule 12: That he shall not leave his county of residence without prior knowledge and permission of the supervising probation agent.

Add Rule 13: That he shall submit to urinalysis screening as directed by his supervising probation agent and that his testing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HardenbrookMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. IsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Willy LevittSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  2. People v. HellenthalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People of Michigan v. Sherrie Lee LillisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API