Legal Opinion
United States v. Ahmad
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 25, 2000No. 98-1467PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reversed by published opinion. Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge WILLIAMS joined.
OPINION
DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:
In this in rem civil action the government appeals an order denying forfeiture of the defendant funds. The government contends that some of the funds were used to structure financial transactions in violation of 31 U.S.C, § 5324 (1994), and that the remainder constitutes a substitute for property involved in customs fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 545 (1994). The district court ruled that neither statute provided a basis for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. Fred S. PangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Gary D. Bollin, United States of America v. Ernst N. Tietjen, United States of America v. James GormleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Commonwealth v. Real Property & Improvements Commonly Known as 5444 Spruce StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- MacLean v. State Board of RetirementMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- United States v. Khalil BlackmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.