Legal Opinion

Palmenberg v. Turk

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 5, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Elliott, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.

The appellants, plaintiffs below, recovered a judgment against the defendant in November, 1893, and in October, 1905, caused a writ of scire facias to be issued upon it. After two returns of nihil, a judgment of fiat was entered in course in January, 1906. In December, 1909, a motion was bled to stinke out the judgment of fiat, upon the grounds of surprise, lack of notice of the scire facias proceedings and the discharge of the defendant in April, 1900, under proceedings in the Bankrupt Court-. This motion was granted and the judgment of fiat stricken oiit on December 12, 1910. Upon the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morris L. Hollowell & Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
  2. Cockey v. EnsorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hajewski v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API