Legal Opinion
Strott v. Derwinski
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided January 10, 1991No. 90-296PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Chief Judge:
Appellant, Richard M. Strott, has noted an appeal from a denial by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) of his claim for service-connected paranoid schizophrenia. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moved to dismiss the appeal noting that appellant’s Notice of Disagreement (NOD) was filed prior to November 18, 1988. Appellant contends that a valid NOD was not filed until February 28, 1989, after November 18,1988, the threshold date for jurisdiction. See Veterans’ Judicial Review Act, Pub.L. No. 100-687, § 402, 102 Stat. 4105, 4122 (1988). Alternatively, appellant challenges…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hamilton v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
- Rita L. Dicarlo v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Hazan v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
- Richard M. Strott v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Constance Copeland v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.