Legal Opinion
Humphrey v. Lane
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 24, 2000No. 1999-0206PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 62.] HUMPHREY, APPELLANT, v. LANE ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Humphrey v. Lane,
2000-Ohio-435.] Civil rights—Standard under Section 7, Article I of the Ohio Constitution for reviewing a generally applicable religion-neutral state regulation that allegedly violates a person’s right to free exercise of religion—Hair length of Native American corrections officer—Least restrictive means of furthering state’s compelling interest not shown. Under Section 7, Article I of the Ohio Constitution, the standard for reviewing a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Catholic Charities of Sacramento, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. CookOhio Court of Appeals · 2020