Legal Opinion
Peloso v. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 10, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
102 N.J. Super. 357 (1968)
246 A.2d 52
ARTHUR A. PELOSO AND MARILYN PELOSO, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CONNECTICUT CORPORATION, AND SOPHIE STEIN SCHILLER, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided July 10, 1968.
Mr. Eugene D. Molinaro, for the plaintiffs.
Mr. William B. McGuire, for defendant, Hartford Fire Insurance Company (Messrs. Lum, Biunno & Tompkins, attorneys).
MEHLER, J.S.C.
This is a motion for summary judgment by Hartford Fire Insurance Company (herein defendant) against plaintiffs on the ground that this action was not commenced within the time…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Proc v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Finkelstein v. AMERICAN INS. CO. OF NEWARKSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Hill v. Home Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- Boyd v. Bankers & Shippers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. Lee Chocolate CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gremillion v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- Greater Providence Trust Co. v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
- Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Gremillion v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- Hughes v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1988