Legal Opinion

Clemenson v. Rebsamen

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 25, 1943No. 4-6959PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

B}^ will, C. J. Mansfield created a trust for the benefit of his only child, the appellant, Mrs. Clemenson. Upon her death such of the property as has not been used by the trustees for her benefit is to go to named legatees. Mrs. Clemenson and all of the remaindermen, except one whose interest they proposed to have protected, agreed upon a termination of the trust and upon an immediate division of the property between them, free of the trust. The trustees refused to surrender the trust property. The Chancellor below refused to order the trustees to turn over the property. Mrs. Clemenson has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Booe v. VinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Black v. BaileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. Driver v. DriverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  4. Pool, Trustee v. Cross County BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hazen v. City of BoonevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Green v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Halliburton Co. v. E.H. Owen Family TrustCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Cotham v. First National Bank of Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. In Re HartmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API