Legal Opinion

Pingel v. Thielman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1963PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting a new trial in the interest of justice under sec. 270.49, Stats. A trial court has the power to grant a new trial in the interest of justice because the verdict is against the great weight of the evidence. Bohlman v. Nelson (1958), 5 Wis. (2d) 77, 92 N. W. (2d) 345; Guptill v. Roemer (1955), 269 Wis. 12, 19, 68 N. W. (2d) 579, 69 N. W. (2d) 571; and Sickling v. Nash Motors Co. (1932), 207 Wis. 16, 21, 238 N. W. 843. This court declared in the Bohlman Case (p. 80):

“The trial court may in the exercise of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Guptill v. RoemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Sichling v. Nash Motors Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Bohlman v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pruss v. StrubeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. McPhillips v. BlomgrenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Landrey v. United Services Automobile Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Brunke v. PoppWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Flippin v. TurlockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API